Fotodigital.ro Fotocamera.ro

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Teleobiectiv Canon, Teleobiectiv puternic si de calitate
Adonis
post 12 Dec 2007, 18:26
Post #1


Junior member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 23-Feb 05
Member No.: 1.755



Vreau sa-mi cumpar un teleobiectiv puternic si de calitate.. m-as indrepta catre Canon. Mi-am pus ochii pe un Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM. E cam scump da cred ca merita... Ce spuneti despre acest obiectiv?


--------------------
Canon Eos 400D
Lens: Canon EF-100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Blitz: Canon 430EX Speedlite, WF-480M Macro
LCD ZigView S2, filtre Hoya si Merkury
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gabi Udrea
post 12 Dec 2007, 18:38
Post #2


Moderator
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 3.934
Joined: 22-Aug 04
From: www.fotodigital.ro
Member No.: 1.184



E cel mai scump dar si cel mai bine cotat tele Canon la ora actuala.
Practic mai bun de atata nu se poate.

Daca merita banii sau nu asta numai tu poti decide. Va fi doar o achizitie extravaganta sau il vei lua ca o investitie de viitor sperand sa-ti returneze banii in timp ? (Asta e intrebarea pe care trebuie sa ti-o pui).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gabi Udrea
post 12 Dec 2007, 18:46
Post #3


Moderator
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 3.934
Joined: 22-Aug 04
From: www.fotodigital.ro
Member No.: 1.184



Ar mai fi o chestiune.
Cum crezi ca ar arata 400mm pe 400D ?

Poate e idee mai buna daca tot vrei sa investesti ceva sa iei un body mai performant, cu AF mai precis si mai rapid, precum noul 40D. In plus posibilitatile de rafala ale acestuia il fac ideal pentru sport si wildlife.

Apoi pentru un astfel de obiectiv vei avea nevoie de un suport foarte solid, fie un monopod zdravan, fie un trepied Gitzo echipat cu Wimberley Head. (despre asta gasesti mai multe detalii prin google).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andreibobia
post 12 Dec 2007, 19:43
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 626
Joined: 21-Oct 06
From: Craiova
Member No.: 3.457



70-200 f2.8


--------------------
2007-2008 FA Barclays Premiership Champions - Manchester United F.C.
2007-2008 UEFA Champions League Winners - Manchester United F.C.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gabi Udrea
post 12 Dec 2007, 19:56
Post #5


Moderator
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 3.934
Joined: 22-Aug 04
From: www.fotodigital.ro
Member No.: 1.184



70-200 e mic daca vrea sa faca wildlife.

Chestia e ca decat sa dea 30.000 RON blink.gif pe 400mm pus pe 400D, mai bine ia Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS cu extender 1.4 si un Canon 1D Mk II N sau MK III.

This post has been edited by Gabi Udrea: 12 Dec 2007, 19:57


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AlexAlly
post 12 Dec 2007, 20:49
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 13-Oct 06
From: Bucicuresti Berechet
Member No.: 3.429



Hahaha, threadul asta e o gluma, nu?..

Daca da, respe©t!

Daca nu, RESPE©T!!! biggrin.gif


--------------------
you can
Canon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adonis
post 12 Dec 2007, 21:04
Post #7


Junior member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 23-Feb 05
Member No.: 1.755



... Gabi, m-ai cam pus pe ganduri... mai astept atunci un body mai performant pentru teleobiectivul asta... Ce spui, pentru 400D merge Canon EF 100-300mm, f/4.0-5.6, Autofocus, USM.. Deocamdata fotografia e doar de hobby, mi-ar placea sa am totusi un obiectiv cat de cat bun, cand ies si eu la o plimbare sa prind de-aproape o ratusca salbatica, un fazan, un iepuras de camp... unsure.gif


--------------------
Canon Eos 400D
Lens: Canon EF-100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Blitz: Canon 430EX Speedlite, WF-480M Macro
LCD ZigView S2, filtre Hoya si Merkury
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gabi Udrea
post 12 Dec 2007, 21:11
Post #8


Moderator
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 3.934
Joined: 22-Aug 04
From: www.fotodigital.ro
Member No.: 1.184



Din cele relativ ieftine ai doua optiuni pentru wildlife.

Fie EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM.
Fie EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM

Ambele sunt ieftine in comparatie cu 400mm 2.8, avantaj pentru 100-400 e IS-ul si manevrabilitatea, pentru 400/5.6 e pretul si un sharpness foarte bun.

Oricare merita sunt foarte bune, si tinand cont ca nu faci lucrul la mod profesional, cel putin nu deocamdata, pentru 400D chiar nu ai de ce sa investesti 30.000 RON.

smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
umbro
post 12 Dec 2007, 22:25
Post #9


Golden Member
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 1.371
Joined: 20-Apr 04
Member No.: 851



100-400 e foarte bun, problema e ca aspira praf, toata lumea o stie. Cumpara si o pompa sau un kit de curatzare pt. senzor.


--------------------
:: Dragostea este triumful imaginatiei impotriva inteligentei. ::

http://photo.net/photos/Dorin%20Vancea
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adonis
post 13 Dec 2007, 09:09
Post #10


Junior member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 23-Feb 05
Member No.: 1.755



QUOTE(umbro @ 12 Dec 2007, 22:25) *
100-400 e foarte bun, problema e ca aspira praf, toata lumea o stie. Cumpara si o pompa sau un kit de curatzare pt. senzor.

... pe langa asta am citit din review-uri ca se comporta bine doar la lumina foarte buna... iar unele sunt foarte soft...


--------------------
Canon Eos 400D
Lens: Canon EF-100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Blitz: Canon 430EX Speedlite, WF-480M Macro
LCD ZigView S2, filtre Hoya si Merkury
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sergione
post 13 Dec 2007, 23:23
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 209
Joined: 1-Jul 05
Member No.: 2.110



70-200 f2.8 cu convertor de 1,4 sau 1,6.In felul asta nu trebuie neaprat sa iti cumperi alt body ca sa iti suporte obiectivul.
Un 400D cu grip face fata obiectivul e mai mult de cat decent .Eu il folosesc la meciuri de fotbal.


--------------------
There is no dark side of the moon really....matter of fact it's all dark.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adonis
post 14 Dec 2007, 09:28
Post #12


Junior member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 23-Feb 05
Member No.: 1.755



Sergione, de ce obiectiv zici: Obiectiv Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM care e cam la 5300 Lei sau de Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM care e pe la 8000? Image stabilizer-ul isi merita diferenta de pret?


--------------------
Canon Eos 400D
Lens: Canon EF-100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Blitz: Canon 430EX Speedlite, WF-480M Macro
LCD ZigView S2, filtre Hoya si Merkury
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sergione
post 14 Dec 2007, 11:06
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 209
Joined: 1-Jul 05
Member No.: 2.110



De cel simplu , fara IS.Am tras si cu cel cu stabilizator , dar sincer cred ca sunt prea putine ocaziile in care chiar ai nevoie de el.Atata timp cat ai un aparat cu performanta ISO buna...


--------------------
There is no dark side of the moon really....matter of fact it's all dark.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18 Sep 2019 - 20:00