Fotodigital.ro Fotocamera.ro

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Obiectiv Canon 350 D
cipus
post 2 May 2007, 17:16
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 5-Jul 06
From: Iasi
Member No.: 3.132



Ce sa aleg intre :

http://www.f64studio.ro/det.php?id=161&pid=4602

http://www.f64studio.ro/det.php?id=161&pid=3009
+
http://www.f64studio.ro/det.php?id=161&pid=3008

Orice alte propuneri sunt binevenite !


--------------------
Panasonic FZ 7
Canon 350 D
fotodigital
www.piumarius.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sarpe_rom
post 2 May 2007, 17:24
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 246
Joined: 5-Feb 07
Member No.: 4.082



De ce nu incerci Tamron 28-75/2.8 Di sai Sigma 24-70/2.8, sunt cele mai bune dupa Canon 24-70/2.8 L din toate punctele de vedere.
Nu uita ca, calitatea vine cu un pret. Stiu ca te bucura celelalte obiective ca au distante focale foarte atragatoare dar nu uita ca cel mai important pentru un obiectiv este imaginea pe care o da.
Numai bine!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DRAKo
post 2 May 2007, 18:01
Post #3


Golden Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2.575
Joined: 6-Jan 05
From: Oradea
Member No.: 1.584



Vad ca sunt focale diferite, alege ce te intereseaza mai mult (a se citi ce folosesti mai mult)


--------------------
N-ar fi rau sa fie bine!


Nume: Mihai Romeo Bogdan
Aparat: Canon 400D, Tokina 12-24 F4 AT-X Pro, Canon 24-70L F2,8 USM, Canon 70-200L F4 USM, Canon 430EX

Panasonic DMC TZ1

http://www.freewebs.com/fotografika/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cipus
post 2 May 2007, 18:20
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 5-Jul 06
From: Iasi
Member No.: 3.132



vreau fotografii sharp, saturate. Ma intereseaza pentru toate genurile de fotografie (natura, portret, still, etc.). Calitatea ma intereseaza cel mai mult


--------------------
Panasonic FZ 7
Canon 350 D
fotodigital
www.piumarius.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sarpe_rom
post 2 May 2007, 20:25
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 246
Joined: 5-Feb 07
Member No.: 4.082



recomand pentru review de obiective:
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/index.php
Numai bine!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gabi Udrea
post 2 May 2007, 20:49
Post #6


Moderator
*****

Group: Special Members
Posts: 3.934
Joined: 22-Aug 04
From: www.fotodigital.ro
Member No.: 1.184



Si aici > http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andreibobia
post 2 May 2007, 21:24
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 626
Joined: 21-Oct 06
From: Craiova
Member No.: 3.457



Cel mai bun ramane tot clasicul de 50mm. tongue.gif


--------------------
2007-2008 FA Barclays Premiership Champions - Manchester United F.C.
2007-2008 UEFA Champions League Winners - Manchester United F.C.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cipus
post 3 May 2007, 09:01
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 5-Jul 06
From: Iasi
Member No.: 3.132



OK m-am oprit la obiectivele astea 2. Care e mai bun ?

http://www.f64studio.ro/det.php?id=161&pid=4580

http://www.f64studio.ro/det.php?id=161&pid=4646


--------------------
Panasonic FZ 7
Canon 350 D
fotodigital
www.piumarius.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sarpe_rom
post 3 May 2007, 11:42
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 246
Joined: 5-Feb 07
Member No.: 4.082



Pai acum depinde te tine ce vrei. Vrei niste focale mai lungi sau niste focale mai normale? Din punct de vedere calitativ ambele sunt aproape la fel de bune. Eu unul as inclina sa zic ca 28-75/2.8 e mai bun putin calitativ decat celalalt. Dar eu sunt subiectiv.
Dupa mine totul depinde de tine si de nevoile tale. Ramane sa iti alegi ce gama de focale iti trebuie si la ce vrei sa folosesti obiectivul.
Ca idee cam toate pozele de aici http://www.badorgood.com/authors_photo.php?id=12265 au fost facute cu obiectivul 17-50/2.8 si celalalt e la fel de bun.
Numai bine!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cipus
post 4 May 2007, 07:22
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 5-Jul 06
From: Iasi
Member No.: 3.132



pai ma intereseaza o imagine cat mai sharp si saturata... Din ce am vazut pe pbase.com pozele facute cu 17-50mm sunt mai sharp. Acuma nu stiu, astept parerile voastre. Daca cele doua obiective sunt identice dpdv al calitatii imaginii atunci merita mai mult 28-75 datorita plajei mare de focale. Astept sugestii celor care le-au incercat pe amandoua


--------------------
Panasonic FZ 7
Canon 350 D
fotodigital
www.piumarius.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sarpe_rom
post 4 May 2007, 08:32
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 246
Joined: 5-Feb 07
Member No.: 4.082



Daca mai ai rabdare 1 sapt pot sa iti fac un review despre 28-75/2.8 fiindca trebuie sa imi ajunga acasa. Despre celalalt cel mai bine vorbesti cu MATUSCIAC ALEXANDRU ca sa iti zica cum se comport fiindca il utilizeaza din plin.
Apropo ce obiectiv ai acum? Ca sa vedem daca diferenta e mare. Fiindca daca inca mai umbli cu obiectivul kit atunci iti pot garanta ca oricare alegi dintre cele doua vei face o algere foarte buna.
Numai bine!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cipus
post 4 May 2007, 11:36
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 5-Jul 06
From: Iasi
Member No.: 3.132



pai de abia am luat aparatul si are obiectivul kit (18-55mm). De aia vreau sa-l schimb smile.gif


--------------------
Panasonic FZ 7
Canon 350 D
fotodigital
www.piumarius.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21 Jul 2019 - 14:49